USAID

Charcoal Use and Technology in Rwanda and Tanzania

Charcoal Use and Technology in Rwanda and Tanzania
Tom Miles March 9, 2008


Small-scale Torrefaction for Developing Countries

Small-scale Torrefaction for Developing Countries
Gerald Van Koeverden, March 08, 2008


Fuel Efficient Stove Programs in IDP Settings - Summary Evaluation Report, Uganda

Fuel Efficient Stove Programs in IDP Settings - Summary Evaluation Report, Uganda
Academy for Educational Development for USAIDi, September 2007

Introduction: Evaluation Objectives

Around the world, conflict and natural disasters have displaced millions of people. Displaced populations fleeing to settlement camps and seeking safety in host villages often put great stress on natural resources, leading to environmental degradation and conflict with local populations. One of the greatest needs of all people affected by crisis, be they displaced, settled or on the move, is firewood or other types of fuel to heat their homes, cook their food, and treat water for drinking and food preparation. The risks endured (especially by women and children) collecting sometimes scarce wood resources constitute some of the most challenging and serious protection concerns both in IDPi camps and in villages where the conflict over resources is high.

USAID’s Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance (OFDAi) has been one of the key US Government funders of humanitarian agencies implementing fuel-efficient stove (FESi) programs in IDPi settings. The FESi programs are intended to help the agencies accomplish various goals, such as improve food security or decrease deforestation, by reducing fuel consumption. However, the large number of implementers, their varying motives and degrees of expertise, and differing conditions within and among IDPi communities have made it difficult for OFDAi to determine the relative efficacy of the FESi interventions and provide guidelines for USAIDi-funded entities working in IDPi settings.

Therefore, OFDAi enlisted the assistance of the USAIDi Energy Team to undertake a multi-phase evaluation in order to derive “best practices” for future FESi interventions. While the primary purpose of this evaluation is to provide guidance to USAIDi-funded organizations, USAIDi hopes to inform the broader humanitarian community by sharing the results of the evaluation with them as well. Eventually, the best practices will be developed into a series of recommendations and toolkits for use by NGOs, donors, and other groups operating FESi programs in IDPi settings.

Syndicate content